The Solar Saros 133 series is also very interesting:
Nov. 14, 2012 at 08:12 in Cooktown, Australia [ = Nov. 13, 2012 22:12 Universal Time]
Nov. 3, 1994 at 11:40 in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Oct. 23, 1976 at 15:13 in Melbourne, Australia
Oct. 12, 1958 at 10:55 in Mahina, French Polynesia
In all of the charts of these eclipses there's a stellium within Libra and Scorpio. Many of the planets that comprise the stellium change from one eclipse in the series to the next, except for Mercury, the North Node and the Sun/Moon eclipse. (Although I think if I took more data points further into the past, Mercury might not consistently show up in the stellium.) And the relationship between the North Node and the eclipse point is always maintained as a conjunction within 4 degrees or less.
Here again is what Celeste Teal says about earthquakes:
Earthquakes are caused by the action of eclipses, often when an eclipse falls in a Fixed sign, or, if there are other planets in Fixed signs at the moment of an eclipse, earthquakes often occur in those parts of the world where these planets are rising, setting, culminating, or on the nadir.
From
http://www.neptunecafe.com/earthquakes.html
In addition, in all but the Oct. 1976 eclipse there is a persistent close aspect between Uranus and Chiron, all under 3 degrees orb.
In Oct. 1958
In Nov. 1994
In Nov. 2012
semi
So, regarding the coming Solar Saros 133 eclipse, it has characteristics like its predecessors (i.e., a stellium within a fixed sign) that would suggest an earthquake is likely. And within the stellium of the eclipse event on Nov. 14, 2012 Saturn is present, and it forms an inconjunct with Uranus (with an orb of only 18 minutes). As we also know, presence of an inconjunct is also a risk factor for earthquakes. So, the probability of an earthquake is now further increased. The suggestion of a Uranus/Chiron relationship in this Saros series could mean the intention of healing mankind by drastic measure (such as from a natural disaster).