THE AGE OF PISCES HAS NOT ENDED & REMAINS IN PLACE FOR SEVERAL CENTURIES - AS ILLUSTRATED FOR SIMPLICITY

[JUPITERASC]

 

[JUPITERASC]

 

[JUPITERASC]

.

The Great Year, Precession & Astrophotography ​

.

 

[JUPITERASC]

 

[JUPITERASC]

 

[JUPITERASC]

 

[JUPITERASC]

 

[DC80]

Wow, I like this, JUPITERASC! I do agree, we're still in Pisces. But, we can see some small signs, already, of Aquarius, sinking it.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Age of Aquarius doesn't start until about 2150.

2160, actually.

You're not gonna like it.

 

[JUPITERASC]

2160, actually.

You're not gonna like it.

Aquarius is a Violent Human Sign

Pisces is neither a Violent nor a Human Sign

.

 

[DC80]

IT MAKES ONE COMPLETE TILT
AND BACK
every 41,000 years
and
this change in tilt is DIRECTLY RELATED TO ICE AGES ON EARTH

That's a myth concocted by he climate nazis.

The glacial state was 40,000 years plus a 12,000 year intraglacial state.

Anyone who made it to middle school should quickly figure out 40,000 + 12,000 = 52,000 which is not 41,000.

FOR ANYONE INTERESTED

You can go here:

IMCCE-VO Solar System Portal

Those very nice French scientists who are way more intelligent than most people and who published lots of papers refuting the claims by the climate nazis can give you all the data.

See?

The INCLINATION of the earths ORBIT has a 100,000 year CYCLE relative to the INVARIABLE PLANE
This 100,000 year CYCLE CLOSELY MATCHES THE PATTERN OF ICE AGES

Not on this planet.

Where there was no correlation at all at least here there is a very weak positive correlation.

Still it doesn't explain the Great Pleistocene Event.

What is it? I have no idea but I don't feel so bad because nobody else has any idea either.

The only thing that's known is that suddenly glacial states stopped lasting 40,000 years and jumped to 80,000 to 120,000 years and the intraglacial state jumped from 12,000 years to anywhere from 15,000 to 32,000 for no apparent reason.

You can plainly see the error. People average 80,000 and 120,000 and get 100,000 which smells like the Milankovitch cycle except it's false.

The very first glaciation after the Great Pleistocene Event was 80,000 years but the rest are all 115,000 to 120,000 years.

MEANWHILE
AT THE PRECISELY TIMED MOMENT OF
SPRING EQUINOX 2023 SIDEREAL CHART LOCATED TO ROME ITALY
NOTICE SUN AT 4 degrees PISCES 55 illustrates visible local skies

That's an Indian thing based on their system of reckoning which astronomers reject.

THE HISTORICAL ALIGNMENT OF THE TWO ZODIACS
Historically, it's generally agreed, that the two zodiacs WERE in alignment with one another
with BOTH sidereal AND tropical ephemeris' listing the passage of the Sun into Aries at the Spring equinox.
about the year 285 A.D.

No, they were aligned circa 2000 BCE.

Sun entered Pisces in 437 CE.

We have an Akkadian map circa 1800 BCE that puts Sun a Aries 0°.

That's Akkadian not Babylonian (because they didn't exist yet.)

However, it's known the were always 0.5° to 1.5° off because they were using apparent position and not actual position and because they weren't aware of things like refraction and parallax. They did the best they could with the technology they had.

and so
there is CURRENTLY a 24 degree gap between the tropical and sidereal systems
making them currently roughly an entire zodiac sign apart

It's 36° actually. That's why the Indian system is bad.

AND
as they continue drifting apart
they won't re- align
with BOTH sidereal AND tropical ephemeris' listing the passage of the Sun into Aries at the Spring equinox.
for another approximately TWENTY-SIX THOUSAND YEARS
which is when the SIDEREAL passage of the Sun returns to Aries at the Spring equinox.

The current star maps and I'm talking about the ones used in guidance systems for ICBMs and SLBMs and for satellites puts Aquarius 0° in 2597 CE.

 

[JUPITERASC]

That's a myth concocted by he climate nazis.
The glacial state was 40,000 years plus a 12,000 year intraglacial state.
Anyone who made it to middle school should quickly figure out 40,000 + 12,000 = 52,000 which is not 41,000.

I'm no mathematician - but makes sense

You can go here:

IMCCE-VO Solar System Portal

Those very nice French scientists who are way more intelligent than most people and who published lots of papers refuting the claims by the climate nazis can give you all the data.

thanks for the info

View attachment 107458

See?
Not on this planet.

okay

View attachment 107460

Where there was no correlation at all at least here there is a very weak positive correlation.
Still it doesn't explain the Great Pleistocene Event.
What is it? I have no idea but I don't feel so bad because nobody else has any idea either.

likewise

The only thing that's known is that suddenly glacial states stopped lasting 40,000 years and jumped to 80,000 to 120,000 years and the intraglacial state jumped from 12,000 years to anywhere from 15,000 to 32,000 for no apparent reason.

weird that

You can plainly see the error. People average 80,000 and 120,000 and get 100,000 which smells like the Milankovitch cycle except it's false.
The very first glaciation after the Great Pleistocene Event was 80,000 years but the rest are all 115,000 to 120,000 years.

That's an Indian thing based on their system of reckoning which astronomers reject.

No, they were aligned circa 2000 BCE.
Sun entered Pisces in 437 CE.
We have an Akkadian map circa 1800 BCE that puts Sun a Aries 0°.
That's Akkadian not Babylonian (because they didn't exist yet .)

However, it's known the were always 0.5° to 1.5° off because they were using apparent position and not actual position and because they weren't aware of things like refraction and parallax. They did the best they could with the technology they had.

indeed

It's 36° actually. That's why the Indian system is bad.

The current star maps and I'm talking about the ones used in guidance systems for ICBMs and SLBMs and for satellites puts Aquarius 0° in 2597 CE.

ah okay

.

 

[Humanitarian]

That's a myth concocted by he climate nazis.

The glacial state was 40,000 years plus a 12,000 year intraglacial state.

Anyone who made it to middle school should quickly figure out 40,000 + 12,000 = 52,000 which is not 41,000.



You can go here:

IMCCE-VO Solar System Portal

Those very nice French scientists who are way more intelligent than most people and who published lots of papers refuting the claims by the climate nazis can give you all the data.

View attachment 107458

See?



Not on this planet.

View attachment 107460

Where there was no correlation at all at least here there is a very weak positive correlation.

Still it doesn't explain the Great Pleistocene Event.

What is it? I have no idea but I don't feel so bad because nobody else has any idea either.

The only thing that's known is that suddenly glacial states stopped lasting 40,000 years and jumped to 80,000 to 120,000 years and the intraglacial state jumped from 12,000 years to anywhere from 15,000 to 32,000 for no apparent reason.

You can plainly see the error. People average 80,000 and 120,000 and get 100,000 which smells like the Milankovitch cycle except it's false.

The very first glaciation after the Great Pleistocene Event was 80,000 years but the rest are all 115,000 to 120,000 years.



That's an Indian thing based on their system of reckoning which astronomers reject.



No, they were aligned circa 2000 BCE.

Sun entered Pisces in 437 CE.

We have an Akkadian map circa 1800 BCE that puts Sun a Aries 0°.

That's Akkadian not Babylonian (because they didn't exist yet.)

However, it's known the were always 0.5° to 1.5° off because they were using apparent position and not actual position and because they weren't aware of things like refraction and parallax. They did the best they could with the technology they had.



It's 36° actually. That's why the Indian system is bad.



The current star maps and I'm talking about the ones used in guidance systems for ICBMs and SLBMs and for satellites puts Aquarius 0° in 2597 CE.

If it's 36° now, are we in the age of Aquarius now or not? I don't see Aquarian correlations in mundane events now, except war and violent events

 

[JUPITERASC]

.

The current star maps and
I'm talking about the ones used in guidance systems for ICBMs and SLBMs and for satellites
puts Aquarius 0° in 2597 CE.

worth highlighting that Aquarius is a Violent Human Sign


.

 

[DC80]

If one of themes of the Piscean age is religion. Then one of the themes of the Age of Aquarius is technology?

Religion already existed and was well-developed.

View attachment 101020

The eagle one. There's an Assyriologist who has an interesting take on that.

He says, as you know, Fomalhaut was one of the regal stars or royalty stars along with Regulus and the two others.

But at a certain point they would not have been able to see Fomalhaut because it would still be below the horizon while the other three were rising and the date that would have happened escapes me but he says instead they adopted Altair from Aquila which is the eagle and that's how eagles came to be associated with royalty and government.

I'm amused at how all these scholars are completely baffled with Leo, Hydra and Corvus and don't understand why those three are linked together.

Hydra is the serpent and Ningizzida the serpent god and Akkadian and Babylonian star lists show that (his Akkadian name was Nirah). It's in the south and I think that was the way of Ea (his father).

If those scholar guys would just read what the other scholar guys right they got the answer right there. The deluge occurred in Leo. This comet or asteroid or whatever that blasted Earth with a big giant tsunami rolling around for a week came from the south out of Hydra.

Corvus is the raven. In all the deluge stories they send out a raven except for the Phoenicians and the Ugarit folks who say it was a dove and then the Hebrews blended those stories together to get a raven and a dove.

And then they can't figure out why Sagittarius is the gatekeeper pointing at Hydra. Well, duh, the gatekeeper's job is to guard the gate to keep stuff from coming out of Hydra and blasting Earth.

Oh, the other thing. The exaltation points as latitudes (terrestrial or celestial meaning declination). This is what Robert Hand and Robert Schmidt have to say about that.

1) The Greeks are wrong.
2) The Greeks are right but we don't understand why they're right.
3) "The values represent a date in the far remote past when the planets actually did have something like those values."
4) "These values represent a zodiac with a radically different basis than either the 0° Aries or the 8° Aries tropical zodiac that Valens seems to use."
Hand and Schmidt think it's a combo of 3 & 4 but that is freaking mind-blowing.

You understand what I'm talking about, right? I mean you do understand the implications of that, right?

Because the equator is a right angle the angle of tilt matches the equator's elevation above the Plane of the Ecliptic. At minimum tilt 21.1° then the equator is angled to the Plane of the Ecliptic by 21.1° and when the obliquity is 24.5° the equator is has moved up to 24.5° and it shifts declination up.

If the tilt is 22.5° and the declination of Mars is 28° then when the tilt goes to 23.5° the declination of Mars goes to 27°.

The NASA website says we were at maximum tilt circa 10000 BCE. It takes 20,500 years to go from minimum to maximum and then another 20,500 to go from maximum to minimum for the cycle of 41,000 years.

That means the exaltation points for the stars had to be around 24,000 BCE or so.
That means 26,000 years ago:
1) The zodiac existed in some form or another
2) Somebody had a big brain and knew how to do math
3) Somebody knew Earth was a sphere
4) Somebody divided it up into 360°
5) And if they weren't projecting terrestrial longitude then somebody had a really really big brain and could do a whole lotta math and could calculate declination

Historians will lie and say no but I've suspected they've been lying for a long time and lying intentionally for no good reason.

Exhibit #1. An underwater city off the coast of India. Exhibit #2. An underwater temple off the coast of Japan. Exhibit #3. An underwater city in the south Pacific islands. And that's just for starters.

It's really embarrassing because this underwater city in the south pacific has granite walls and granite structures.

I hate to be Captain Obvious but it is physically and geologically impossible for granite to exist on volcanic islands which is what they are or on coral reefs which are just extensions of volcanic islands. Take Bermuda.

You got an undersea volcano that breaches the surface. Dum-dee-dum-dee-dum a million years later it goes extinct and coral reefs start growing round it. Dum-dee-dum-dee-dum a million years later all the coral's dead because of climate change. Dum-dee-dum-dee-dum a million years later the dead coral gets squeezed together and presto. You got limestone.

Bermuda's a big slab of limestone sitting atop tholeitic lava. But no granite.

So those Islanders would have to get in their little boats and paddle all the way to China or Australia or South America to go on a granite hunt.

You can forget about Australia for a lot of reasons. The liars tell us nobody came across the land bridge that never existed before 15,000 years ago so that would mean they'd have to park their little boats and then go mountain climbing and I'm sure they were appropriately dressed for that to hunt for a suitable site to quarry granite. And then they'd have to bring a whole lotta people there because one guy with one stone chisel and one rock ain't gonna make it happen.

I'm sure they went to China because there's pre-historic granite quarries there.

Captain Obvious again, no one is dumb enough to build cities and temples underwater so those things existed at least as late as 14,000 years ago when the sea levels were lower. And then the glacial age suddenly ended when a big freaking rock from outer space made a mess of things.

And then there's Machu Picchu. I don't think it was Neugebauer. I think it was the other German that came up with archeo-astronomy. Don't bother googling because the frightened mice have perverted it into a whole bunch of different things and none of them have anything to do with astronomy or archaeology but it was a way of dating structures based on the Earth's tilt at the solstice points.

The date he got was 14,400 BCE or 4,600 CE. Since that hasn't happened yet it has to be 14,400 BCE even though they refuse to admit it.

But, yeah, if Hand and Schmidt are right then a whole lotta heads are gonna role.

 

[JUPITERASC]

.








.

 

[LeoJeo]

If it's 36° now, are we in the age of Aquarius now or not? I don't see Aquarian correlations in mundane events now, except war and violent events

The entire subject of identity is very popular now in the modern era, along with self-expression, signaling the truth that we are indeed in the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. Leo is just as important to this age as Aquarius because the ages always have the tell-tale signs of each Astrological pair. Last age was Pisces and so Yeshua or Jesus was the main concern, along with Islam and eventually (already) we will move into a new religion that is actually true.

Not many understand this, but this age will be the biggest upgrade we've ever experienced. Its Atlantis but more, so it will be a New Atlantis on a New Gaia. Anyone wanting to know more just reply here or DM me.

 

[Mad Madam Mimm]

If one of themes of the Piscean age is religion. Then one of the themes of the Age of Aquarius is technology?

That’s a good question? I consider religion to have components of masculine projection, like the devil is outside of us . I believe it’s already started , the shift being a personal one for each individual. We will start going more within , acting from our empathetic heart space . That sounds like Pisces , but, if you consider survival and the greater hood of community and survival… it’s not. That’s Aquarius. Just my two cents . Nobody knows because ,it’s unprecedented. Something different is in the air , for sure.

 

[JUPITERASC]

If one of themes of the Piscean age is religion. Then one of the themes of the Age of Aquarius is technology?

Scientists Still Can't Explain This Ancient Technology ​

.