- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 440
1980 was a mutation (I may have said that earlier in the thread, not sure).
Once in a while 40-60 years before the cycle changes, you get a preview of coming attractions, so to speak, as the planets conjunct in the next sign (Libra instead of Virgo that time.
I wouldn't be so sure about another big war, or a nuclear one. Israel. Ukraine - the EU has decided it's ok for their countries to lob missiles into Russia.
Have you noticed that that building - is it the EU Parliament? seems to be based on Breugels' Tower of Babylon?
Could they be more obvious?
Or is it just me seeing it?
Yeah, I guess I just wasn't aware that a mutation wouldn't be the same as the normal Air cycle starting.
I mean, I wouldn't rule out global nuclear war, that's always a possibility now that nukes exist. If that happens, I suppose it would prove the Air cycle is indeed worse than the Earth cycle, but global nuclear war is basically the only thing I can think of that might be worse than two World Wars and a very long Cold War right after it. I guess we will find out.
I was just looking at the past Air cycles, and really the main thing that stood out to me as oddly horrible for medieval times in it, was the Black Death. Though, the Fall of Rome in 476 did happen on a Gemini cycle... though I still have yet to find anything particularly bad happening during a Libra conjunction, but that could just mean Libra is the least bad of the air signs. I mean, Jupiter isn't debilitated in Libra, and exaltation isn't as strong a dignity as domicile traditionally, if I recall correctly? Plus, Libra is ruled by Venus, the lesser benefic. So logically, we might expect that Libra isn't as bad as the other two, right?
I am curious, was there a traditional consensus about the great conjunctions involving the air signs being the worst because Saturn is dignified in them? Or did different authors differ on that one?