Just one more post of comment here, as I realize that Sabian Symbols are still not recognized as "acceptable principles" themselves, in Astrological circles presently. I might end up getting arrested or exiled myself?
I shouldn't have made such a flippant comment as I did in the post where I present the symbolism for the Part of Hyleg derived from the event charts, it just seemed to be a humorous, and clever, quip at the moment,,, and I hadn't yet really given the matter any introspective thought.
While Trump claims that he is only trying to "make America great again, that is to return the United States to the ways, the state of being, of the past, it is still a "transformative" process that he wishes to introduce.
What the Democrat's have been up to, allowing unprecedented numbers of illegal aliens to cross our borders, to hand out stipends and housing vouchers to them, to practically give them an invulnerable cloak of sanctuary, even when they are guilty of crimes, I, and many others, find to be "unacceptable principles" being introduced to society... or more as to like being rammed down our throats.
That high raking politicians have relatives in positions of lucrative compensation, I also find to be "unacceptable principles", e.g. Hunter Biden on the board of directors of a Ukrainian energy company by the name of Burisma, Nancy Pelosi's only son has had controversial positions within companies that can seemingly be due to her political influence, and John Kerry having the same, and in association with Hunter Biden too, as to co-founding financial services company, Rosemont Seneca Partners, with John Kerry's step son, Christopher Heinz, who joined Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, one of Heinz' classmates at Yale University, in 2009.
...and then again in 2012, when Hunter Biden and Devon Archer talked to Chinese private equity investor Jonathan Li about joining forces on a fund that would invest Chinese capital - and possibly capital from other countries - outside of China. Which includes a lot in America, only "investing" mostly means the buying up of American companies, as much farmland in California that they've been able to, and numerous other land acquisitions all over the United States. All of which I find to be unacceptable, myself, even though that kind of stuff has been going on in Washington for many years, and isn't anything that can be said to be "newly introduced"
What I see as being newly introduced, is Trump attempting to "drain the swamp", the very swamp that continues to spawn such danmable activities.
Yet Trump did take some rather radical, and "newly introduced", actions in the four years He was in the office. The recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, which I think is highly commendable, but I am also aware is highly controversial and certainly unprecedented. His use of that drone to assassinate the Iranian General, Qasem Soleimani, was considered to be outside of "accepted principles", and was highly controversial, and some said it was even criminal, although I found it to be most commendable, that he really showed us "a pair" in doing so, and that goes for the recognition of Jerusalem as well, for that matter.
However, Trumps support of electronic currency is one unprecedented "principle" that I find to be disturbing, and is unacceptable to me. I don't want to see the end of the use of currency, tangible currency that is. Not that I'm fond of, or even condoning, of the use of fiat money, as I'd much like to see a return to "hard currency", I.e. the use of silver and gold in coinage and "certificates on demand", but I also know that likely won't happen again, at least not in the remaining years of my lifetime. But the exclusive use of electronic currency to me is the sign that the "Beast" has arrived upon the world scene. While I'm not inclined to believe the prophecy attributed to the Book of Revelation, I still find it most disturbing.
[Note: that the number, or "mark" of the beast, I.e. 666 transliterates into Hebrew as the letter Vav, the Hebrew equivalent of the English alphabet's letter, the "W", and we all know what WWW is. Besides, it was most likely that the dream that John of "Revelation" had, didn't produce Arabic numerals, as they didn't exist until the 6th century and weren't know of outside of India until the 8th century. That dream of John is said to have occurred in the late first or early second century, and Arabic numerals weren't even known of in Europe until the 11th century, and at first, until about the 12th century, they were only knows of to a few scribes, then gradually to the royalty, and were not in the general awareness of the masses until the 16th century. Those numbers that appeared in that dream were surely in a form that the Hebrews used, or possibly in Roman numerals form, but not likely the Roman. My experience with dream interpretation, and I am clairvoyant in the dream state but I can't induce it, has proven to me that the symbolism seen in dreams must always be deposed into the provenance from which the dream one had, in turn, is attributed to be about. As I see it, anything Biblical, whether it be as to the Old Testament or the New, is of the provenance of the Hebrews. As the entire reason for the existence of the New Testament is because Christians believe the man known as Yeshu'a/Jesus, is the messiah, and the "messiah" is of the provenance of the Hebrews. The concept originated with their religion, and regardless of whether or not they recognized the Nazarene as being that, it is still their call as to whom that mantle does eventually fall upon. IMHO... of course. In short, I don't agree with much the Vatican has had to say about the matter, any matter at all, concerning Christianity and particularly anything found in the Book of Revelation... the very existence of which, is the Vatican's doing to begin with.
I apologize for this digression, but a digression I felt was necessary to explain my reference to the seemingly appearance of the "Beast". ]
In the words of Chester A. Riley, "what a revolting development this has become".
I may just end up voting for whichever candidate causes me to vomit the least between now and November 5th.