Xeno
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2023
- Messages
- 87
I suggest you replace the term divination with the term observer effect .. especially regarding horary predictionsMerven, thanks for your thoughtful post.
My mind is boggled.
I view AI as a double-edged sword. Every new technology seems to have this effect on society: some benefits some detriments. Television opened new worlds to viewers in the 1950s, but a big impact was that screen time replaced a lot of human interaction, and replaced it with mind-numbing trivia. Kids spent more time with the television than they did with their fathers. Now kids are glued to their cell phones; yet as a parent, it was a relief to have a faster way to reach them. On my cell phone I have information at my finger tips that used to require a trip to the library. But it can be a huge time-waster, as well. I'm not on social media, because to me, the negatives outweigh the positives. Personal GPS systems have cut down on people's ability to navigate and way-find without an electronic aid.
Pluto in Aquarius will probably show us the dark side of AI, as Aquarius and Uranus modernly rule things electronic and futuristic.
I am wondering about various cognitive biases that might affect AI astrology, as these affect astrology now.
For example, you are aware of the "garbage in, garbage out" problem of scientific research. In psychology, there's confirmation bias, where people tend to select new information as true or false based primarily on their prior beliefs. The Barnum effect is about people tending to believe individual personality interpretations, even though these could just as easily apply to millions of people.
Astrological interpretations, sadly, are often dead wrong. Will AI correct these errors, or simply repeat and reinforce them?
We still don't know why astrology works (assuming it does.) Simple physical causal models (like electromagnetism) fall apart in horary astrology. Astrology as a form of divination presupposes a spiritual metaphysics that would exclude rationalists. This is all material for another post, if not another thread, but I think if we could figure that out, AI would have more of a chance of accurate interpretations and predictions.
Then it all comes down to the fact that by performing horary, we create the observer effect and influence reality in a quantum way
It is quite difficult to calculate this effect .. but in general we can say with confidence that it adds at least a few percent to its probability
I often say that horary works approximately 60 to 40 (55-60%)
And yes - the choice of horary technique does not matter ))