Pierce, your Jesus' birth chart is contradicted with the Bible. The birth time is aproximately 5 pm but th Bible states that Jesus birth time was in the middle of the night. So why did you believe his birth time was 5 pm?
Rudy
Don't you know that Rome wrote most of what is in the so called "New Testament"? That they rejected, something as around the number of, 25 submissions from one of the disciples and finally telling him to, more or less, forget about it and that they would write the book credited to his name? [
and I forget the exact details as I read of this over 40 years ago, although it was written by, I believe it was, Mdm Blavatsky, of the Theosophists and there are many, that give her little, if any, credit as to being such an authority....so,you must decide for yourself. My late mother was a most avid student and researcher about Biblical matters and she told me at a very young age to regard the New Testament as mostly politically manipulated accounts... propaganda, if the term pleases you?]
The world is becoming more aware of the manipulations of Rome with each passing year. I now believe that the majority of Christians agree that December 25th is a date chosen by Rome for purposes other than to truly honor the actual birth date of Jesus/Yeshu'a of Nazareth. If not the majority the numbers surely are very close to it at this time.
The Pope that died in 2005, Pope John Paul II, died on April 2nd and I was watching the television at the time and I saw and heard ABC news journalist, Charlie Gibbons remark, live on tv, that He was certain that Pope John Paul II had held on to life dearly just so as He could die on that very day and said that he, himself, did remember an [
unnamed] source in the Vatican telling him some years before that April 2nd, was the true birth date of Jesus.
While it was April 1st until the year 2000, because of the addition of one day to the Gregorian calendar every century that is divisible by 4 [
thus since the year 1600 the true birth date was in fact on April Fools Day. Presently, and until the year 2400, we must add 12 days to all dates prior to the inception of the Gregorian calendar.] then Mr. Gibbons was either told that after the year 1999 or was aware of the date change needed and made a fully informed and accurate statement. As I sat there and watched that tv and heard his comment, with a few of my friends present, I yelled out at the tv, "You're d*** right it is and He [
the late Pope] surely knew it and was trying to make a statement that He couldn't make while he was still alive."
He possibly made some sort of blood oath, or something of a similar nature, to never reveal truths about certain matters.
Edgar Cayce was once asked in a reading if there were any actual first hand written accounts remaining of what Jesus/Yeshu'a actually said, did, or otherwise was seen involved in during his lifetime on Earth. Cayce replied that the last know accounts all perished in the fire when the library at Alexandria was burned by the Mohamedeans [sic] in the year [
a little trouble here on my part remembering the exact year given but if I'm not accurate then I'm only off by two to three years, possibly five at the most] 707 A.D. [or C.E. for those that prefer]. ...and I've heard all the arguments that they burned the books to keep the baths warm for the conquering Beys, but I must say that these were Arabs that are in question as to their actions and the Arabs are very wise and savvy scavengers and they never destroy anything of any value whether it be intrinsic or academic....and I mean no disrespect to the Arabs by my statement but even they know the truth of my words. It's a hard life in the desert regions and anything and everything other than sand is held in regard as to what it may provide for continued survival.
But, Edgar Cayce added, in stating, that there may be some accounts still in existence in the Vatican library but that there was no way of knowing for certain....[
I'm a bit hazy on what his exact words were but that is the very gist of what He did say].
Now then, knowing that Cayce was channeling that information, as it was reveled in a reading given by Cayce for the officers of the A.R.E. that all information given by him pertaining to matters other than "health readings" was actually being given through him, at any time, by one of two only possible sources, those being the angelic and, or, the members of the "White Lodge", aka the "Great White Brotherhood", aka The Ascended Masters, of among whom was included the ascended being known by the name of Saint Germain and all of whom could access any locale in the universe simply by desire, need, and thought doesn't it seem a bit strange that they didn't know what was in some areas of the Vatican library?
What could possibly be barring them from entering?
Rites, can be the only answer and "Dark rites" at that.
If you have studied the chart i have submitted, and studied it thoroughly and well, and you have read the presentation and analysis I wrote and you are not convinced of its veracity then, imho, you shouldn't be aspiring to be recognized as an astrologer
... and I don't check in here at the forum on a day by day basis as I did for many years, anymore. I will, however, eventually get to the request...if I don't immediately.
